Client Alerts & Publications

As discussed in our previous Client Alerts on December 9 and December 13, on December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the “District Court”) issued a nationwide preliminary injunction that temporarily blocks enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) related beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting rules.

On December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction that temporarily blocks enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) related beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting rules. On December 12, 2024, the government filed a motion to stay the preliminary injunction pending its appeal.

On December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction that temporarily blocks enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) related beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting rules.

A well-trodden path for banks to achieve regulatory capital reductions by mitigating credit risk is through a synthetic securitization, either by issuing credit-linked notes (CLNs) or engaging in bespoke bilateral credit derivative transactions. These transactions—while complex to execute—offer the significant advantage of transferring risk on a large, diversified portfolio of obligors, allowing investors to evaluate credit risk on a statistical basis. This lessens the need for investor diligence at the level of individual obligations, which facilitates risk transfer on obligors for whom information might be limited or costly to digest.

Chapman wrote the book on the marketplace lending regulatory landscape that the entire industry has come to rely upon. First published in 2013, the 2024 update covers a vast array of topics affecting the marketplace lending industry.

The Division of Examinations of the Securities and Exchange Commission published its examination priorities for fiscal year 2025. The 2025 Exam Priorities reflect practices, products, and services the Division believes present heightened risks to investors and the U.S. capital markets.

There have been several recent notable enforcement actions, including continued enforcement by the SEC and CFTC against off-channel communications, as well as an SEC fraud settlement with Macquarie Investment Management Business Trust.

Chapman's quarterly Regulatory Update contains an overview of the latest regulatory actions, market happenings, and litigation and enforcement activity in the investment management space.

On September 12, 2024, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) adopted amendments to CFTC Regulation 4.7 (Reg. 4.7), a rule that provides exemptions from the broader compliance requirements under Part 4 of the CFTC regulations (Part 4) for registered commodity pool operators (CPOs) with respect to pools (4.7 pools) offered solely to “Qualified Eligible Persons” (QEPs) and registered commodity trading advisors (CTAs) that advise or manage commodity trading accounts of QEPs. The amendments (i) increase the financial thresholds in the “Portfolio Requirement” of the QEP definition and (ii) permit CPOs of fund of fund pools offered solely to QEPs to provide monthly account statements within 45 days of the month-end, rather than providing quarterly account statements within 30 days of the quarter-end. The CFTC chose not to adopt, at this time, the proposed minimum QEP disclosures.

On August 22, 2024, a proposed rule (the “Proposed Joint Rule”) mandated by the Financial Data Transparency Act of 2022 (the “FDTA”) and adopted by nine federal financial regulators, including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” and, together with the other eight regulators, the “Covered Agencies”), was published in the Federal Register. 

Chapman's white paper provides a summary of the interval fund and tender offer fund structures, including their basic legal framework, their investment restrictions, how they are distributed and how they facilitate redemptions. It also provides a comparison of interval funds and tender offer funds, both to each other and to other types of investment companies.

The Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”), rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) pursuant thereto, and state laws governing the activities of investment advisers determine when persons engaged in the business of providing investment advice must or may register as an investment adviser with either the SEC or the relevant state authorities.

On June 27, 2024, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of the United States Trustee, who had objected to Purdue’s plan of reorganization that granted releases of third party claims to members of the Sackler family in exchange for their contribution of up to $6 billion to the Purdue bankruptcy estate. Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, found that the type of relief being granted to the Sacklers (i.e., a blanket shield from all existing or potential liability relating to the opioid crisis) represented the kind of “discharge” only available to debtors who have “placed all their assets on the table.”

In a decision that should help restore investors’ faith in the protections afforded municipal bondholders under the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), on June 12, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (the “First Circuit” or the “Court”) held that the bondholders (the “Bondholders”) of certain Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) electric revenue bonds (the “Bonds”) have a non-recourse claim against PREPA’s estate in PREPA’s reorganization proceedings under Title III of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act, 48 U.S.C. §§ 2161-78 (“PROMESA”), for the full principal amount of their outstanding Bonds, plus matured interest, of approximately $8.5 billion, and that the Bonds are secured by PREPA’s current and future Net Revenues.

Despite recent regulatory efforts from FINRA and the SEC, industry participants continue to have no clear understanding of what qualifies a product as either “complex” or “risky.”  In this article, Chapman attorneys provide insight and context for a path forward for definitive guidance regarding complex products, but also for a more rational regulatory scheme that considers a wide variety of factors. This article proposes an objective framework for broker-dealers and investment advisers to consider Defined Outcome ETFs, regardless of whether they are deemed complex under the current regulatory environment, by utilizing a well-established measure of risk to assess whether an investment in those vehicles is in a client’s best interest.

On June 7, Governor Pritzker signed into law House Bill 4582, Public Act 103-0591 (the “Act”). Among other items, the Act amends the School Code, the Local Government Debt Reform Act (Debt Reform Act), and the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law (PTELL).

On June 5, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (the “Court”) determined to vacate rules recently adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) regulating the conduct of investment advisers to private investment funds (the “Private Fund Advisers Rule”).

On May 16, 2024, the IRS released Notice 2024-41 (the “Notice”), which provides updated guidance on the domestic content bonus energy credit available for qualifying energy projects under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the "IRA"). The Notice modifies existing guidance on the domestic content bonus under Notice 2023-38 (“Notice 2023-38”) and establishes a new elective safe harbor (the “New Elective Safe Harbor”) that allows project owners to determine certain projects’ eligibility for the domestic content bonus using predetermined cost percentages provided by the IRS.  

On April 23, 2024, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) released its final investment advice fiduciary rule, titled the Retirement Security Rule (the “Final Rule”), which re-defines who is a fiduciary on account of providing investment advice to workplace retirement plans and individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”). In addition, the DOL released several amended DOL prohibited transaction exemptions that, together with the Final Rule, are “intended to protect the interests of retirement investors by requiring persons who are defined in the Final Rule as investment advice fiduciaries to adhere to stringent conduct standards and mitigate their conflicts of interest.” The Final Rule and the amended exemptions finalize the proposed investment advice fiduciary rule and proposed amendments to the prohibited transaction exemptions, which the DOL issued on October 31, 2023. The Final Rule narrows certain provisions in the proposed rule that some commentators and industry groups argued were overly broad. The Final Rule and the amended prohibited transaction exemptions will become effective on September 23, 2024, except that certain provisions in the amended exemptions will not be phased in until one year after such effective date.

Amidst an ever-changing US regulatory landscape, Israeli fintechs need to carefully consider their licensing obligations when offering their products to US consumers. Chapman partner Tobias Moon provides perspective on regulatory considerations associated with the credit products Israeli fintech companies are offering to US-based consumers in the US-Israel Legal Review, published by Israel Desks.

In February 2023, Perpetual US Services, LLC filed an application for exemptive relief with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that, if granted, would allow a mutual fund to create and operate an ETF share class alongside its mutual fund share classes. In the February 2024 issue of The Investment Lawyer, Chapman partners Rick Coyle, Barry Pershkow and Morrison Warren break down the history of the sought-after relief, the potential advantages to such a structure for mutual fund sponsors and shareholders, and share their insights into the SEC’s reluctance to grant such relief, while ultimately arguing that the approval of these applications is the proper step for the SEC to take.

Earlier this month, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) finalized a long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures by public companies and in public offerings. See here. The rule does not apply to public asset-backed securities (“ABS”) issuers and the SEC has stated that it will continue to review climate disclosures related to these issuers.

Earlier this month, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) finalized a long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures by public companies and in public offerings. See here. The SEC’s rule is already facing legal challenges, including a recent ruling that temporarily blocks the rule from taking effect.

In its 2024 Supervisory Priorities, the NCUA set out examination priorities based on activities that pose the highest risk to federally insured credit union members (referred to as “credit unions”) and that are responsive to the continuous stream of challenges facing credit unions in this current market. It should come as no surprise to anyone that liquidity risk is once again an examination priority for 2024, as the economic environment continues to be uncertain. This all follows on the heels of the Addendum to the Interagency Policy Statement on Funding and Liquidity Risk Management: Importance of Contingency Funding Plans issued in July 2023 (the “Addendum”), highlighting the importance of contingency funding plans as a crucial component of managing funding and liquidity risk. 

On November 27, 2023, the US Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted final Securities Act Rule 192 (“Final Rule 192”) prohibiting certain conflicts of interest in securitization transactions. In general, Final Rule 192 prohibits a “securitization participant” with respect to an “asset-backed security” (“ABS”) from directly or indirectly engaging in any “conflicted transaction” during the applicable prohibition period.

The Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (the “Bankruptcy Court”) recently issued a decision in In re Envision Healthcare holding that a debtor did not forfeit its rights (including voting and managerial rights) in a Delaware limited liability company (an “LLC”) by filing for bankruptcy, notwithstanding the fact that Delaware state law terminates a person’s membership interest in an LLC upon the member’s bankruptcy.

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) went into effect January 1, 2024. Under the CTA, all newly created entities are now required to file a report with the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) within 90 days of formation, unless an entity qualifies under one of 23 exemptions. That means, unless an exemption applies, any newly formed LLC, limited partnership, corporation, statutory trust, or other organization that is created by filing with a secretary of state has an additional federal filing requirement. All existing entities formed prior to January 1, 2024, that do not qualify for an exemption have until the end of 2024 to file a Report.

On December 22, 2023, the Internal Revenue Service unveiled its online pre-registration portal for elective pay (or “direct pay”) and transferability of tax credits under the Inflation Reduction Act (the “IRA”). Separately, on December 28, 2023, the IRS released Notice 2024-9, which provides relief for taxpayers facing a phaseout of elective pay tax credits related to a failure to meet certain domestic content requirements.