Client Alerts & Publications Archive

Chapman's quarterly Regulatory Update contains an overview of the latest regulatory actions, market happenings, and litigation and enforcement activity in the investment management space.

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued an eagerly awaited decision in Kirschner v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., which reconfirmed the widely accepted view that loans are not securities under federal or state securities laws.

On August 23, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) voted 3 to 2 to adopt new and amended rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”) requiring advisers to private funds to provide additional disclosures to investors in such funds, restrict certain types of preferential treatment to investors, and impose new requirements related to fund audits, books and records, and adviser-led secondary transactions.

On July 27, 2023, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued a joint Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the “NPR”) proposing significant changes to the US bank capital regulations. The NPR proposes several changes to the regulations for determining required capital for bank securitization exposures and additional changes that will impact securitization exposure capital charges. While the proposed changes impact banks originating both traditional and synthetic securitization of their own assets, and securitization exposures in the form of derivatives, and provide a new method for determining the risk weights of exposures to Non-performing Loan (“NPL”) securitizations, this Client Alert focuses on the impact of the proposed rules on banks investing in securitization transactions (other than NPL securitizations), both by buying asset-backed securities with the intent to hold such securities and by providing financing of securitizations by making loans or entering into asset purchase facilities, either directly or through credit and liquidity facilities provided to asset-backed commercial paper (“ABCP”) conduits.

Law firms can enhance their commitment to pro bono work by finding small ways to increase participation throughout their workforce.

Chapman's quarterly Regulatory Update contains an overview of the latest regulatory actions, market happenings, and litigation and enforcement activity in the investment management space.

One of the most innovative features of the energy tax credit provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act (the “IRA”), which became law on August 16, 2022, is a pair of provisions that allow taxpayers to sell energy tax credits to a third party for cash (Section 6418) or to elect to receive a cash payment of the tax credit directly from the federal government (Section 6417).¹ Since the IRA was enacted, taxpayers, tax-exempt organizations, governmental entities, and their advisors have been counting the days for the IRS to provide guidance on how to apply these monetization provisions, which are expected to be a game-changer in the U.S. market for investment into green energy technologies. 

The IRS released a major package of temporary and proposed regulations on these provisions on June 14, 2023.

Chapman partners Michael Friedman and Eric Silvestri, and associate Helena Honig discuss a recent decision of the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York in an article published in the June 2023 issue of Israel Desks Magazine.

On June 5, 2023, the Governor of Colorado signed into law House Bill 23-1229 which contains a purported “opt out” of federal preemption made available to state chartered, FDIC insured institutions.  It appears aimed at least in part to online lenders making loans to Colorado residents. Whether this action will trigger additional states to attempt a similar move or whether this legislation is even valid will likely end up in litigation, teeing up another potential battle on federal preemption vs. states rights and likely leaving Colorado borrowers in limbo for some time to come. Of note, this law does not become effective until July 1, 2024.

The International Comparative Legal Guide - Securitisation 2023, now in its sixteenth edition, is a leading legal text spanning the global securitization market, providing insights into the US and EU CLO market, cross-border trade receivables, taxation, and other topical issues and jurisdictions. Chapman partners David Nirenberg and Steven Kopp, recognized authorities on the tax treatment of US securitization transactions, co-authored the chapter entitled, "U.S. Withholding on Asset-Backed and Structured Securities."

This Alert discusses the recent Delaware cases related to the duty of oversight and the recent decision of the Delaware Chancery court in a shareholders derivative lawsuit brought by the shareholders of McDonalds.

The Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) has been in debt adjustment proceedings since 2017 under the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”), which was signed into law in 2016.

Distressed US assets present unique investment opportunities for those willing to accept certain levels of risk and create value. Michael Friedman, Chapman's Israel practice head and practice leader for the firm's Special Situations and Restructuring Group, and associate Helena Honig, provide perspective on distressed investing in the United States in the US-Israel Legal Review, published by Israel Desks.

On March 15, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued a series of proposals designed to improve firms’ preparedness and responses to cyber incidents. The proposals, which would impact many of the financial services industry participants regulated by the SEC, generally require that firms establish policies and procedures to better prevent and detect cyber incidents and disclose certain cyber incidents to clients and the SEC within specified time periods.

On January 25, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued a proposed rule to prevent and avoid material conflicts of interest in certain securitization transactions. The rule would prohibit securitization participants from engaging in certain transactions that could incentivize structuring an asset-backed securities (“ABS”) transaction in a way that would put the securitization participant’s interests ahead of the interests of the ABS investors.

On March 14, 2023, an announcement from the CEO of the newly-created, full-service FDIC-operated Bridge Bank was posted on the Silicon Valley Bank website indicating that the Bridge Bank has “fully stepped into the shoes of the former Silicon Valley Bank.”

On Monday, March 13, 2023, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation transferred all deposits—both insured and uninsured—and substantially all assets of the former Silicon Valley Bank to Silicon Valley Bank, N.A, a newly created, full-service FDIC-operated ‘bridge bank’. The FDIC has not stated whether the bridge bank has assumed funding obligations under the former Silicon Valley Bank’s unfunded loan commitments.

Included in this Frequently Asked Questions are some general observations on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) receivership process for Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”). The specifics of the receivership process are uncertain at this early stage and, hopefully, more guidance with respect to the issues discussed below will be provided by the FDIC over the next few days.

On February 13, 2023, the IRS released Notices 2023-17 and 2023-18, which provide guidance on energy incentive tax credit provisions that were amended by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the "IRA"). Taxpayers and their advisors have been eagerly awaiting guidance on many aspects of the IRA's changes. The guidance in Notices 2023-17 and 2023-18, however, does not cover many of the most pressing issues regarding the new tax credit rules, such as the details of how to obtain a refund of tax credits under the new “direct pay” provision and how to comply with the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements. The IRS has stated that it will issue additional guidance on the IRA's changes to existing tax credit provisions in the future.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently took up In re Grand Jury, No. 21-1397, from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to address a common, recurring, and sometimes vexing question as to attorney-client privilege: how to apply the privilege to communications with counsel that contain both legal and non-legal advice? This is a particularly important question for corporate in-house counsel who, as the courts often say, “wear two hats,” providing both legal and business or policy advice to their employers.

On February 22, 2023, the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) proposed the adoption of new listing standards contained in the Corporate Governance section of the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the “Manual”). New Section 303A.14 would “require issuers to develop and implement a policy providing for the recovery of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation received by current or former executive officers.”

On February 15, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted rule changes to Exchange Act Rule 15c6-1, shortening the standard settlement cycle for most broker-dealer transactions in securities from two business days after the trade date (T+2) to one day (T+1).

On February 15, 2023, by a vote of 4 to 1 with only Commissioner Peirce voting no, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission proposed to amend the content of Rule 206(4)-2 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”), known as the Custody Rule, and redesignate it as Rule 223-1 under the Advisers Act, now known as the Safeguarding Rule. If adopted, the proposal would, among other things, expand the coverage of the Advisers Act’s custody provisions beyond “client funds and securities” to include any client assets of which an adviser has custody, a change that would bring within the rule’s coverage all digital assets, including non-securities such as commodities. Such a change would impose a requirement on many investment advisers that hold client assets to place those assets with a “qualified custodian,” despite a current lack of widespread availability of such service providers for many digital assets.

The much anticipated updated regulations for disclosure requirements for commercial financing in New York have been adopted by the New York Department of Financial Services ("NYDFS"). 

This Chapman Insights article is part of our ongoing series on Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) financings. 

Pratt's Journal of Bankruptcy Law republished a Chapman Client Alert.

At a time when the digital asset market is badly in need of good news, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) has delivered the long-awaited ISDA Digital Asset Derivatives Definitions (the “Definitions”).

This Chapman Insights article is the first in a series on Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) financings and focuses on collateral structures. A REIT may incur indebtedness for a variety of purposes, including to smooth out cash flow, as a bridge to an additional capital raise, and/or to leverage its assets for the purpose of acquiring additional assets. While there are many different forms this indebtedness can take — from bank debt to bond issuances — this article highlights considerations when the debt incurred is from a bank or bank group.

The Inflation Reduction Act (the “IRA”), which became law in August 2022, provides one of the most significant packages of renewable energy incentives in recent history. Most of the renewable energy provisions take the form of extended and expanded tax credits, which apply to investments in solar, wind, geothermal and other nontraditional energy resources. One tax credit provision of the IRA that will be of interest to ordinary consumers are the changes to the tax credit for taxpayers who purchase an electric vehicle (the “EV tax credit”).

The Inflation Reduction Act (the "IRA") is being hailed as one of the most significant legislative actions in recent history intended to incentivize investment in renewable energy technologies. The IRA generally achieves this through the extension and broadening of existing tax credit provisions that apply to investments in clean energy technologies such as solar, wind and geothermal. Since the IRA became law in August 2022, taxpayers have been eagerly awaiting regulations and other guidance on how to apply the new provisions and how to claim the tax credits. On November 30, 2022, the IRS issued the first item of guidance on these provisions in the form of IRS Notice 2022-61 (the "Notice").

The NAIC’s multi-year process of modifying its accounting rules to confirm which debt instruments qualify as bonds for regulatory accounting purposes is of interest to insurance companies that use rated notes issued by feeder funds to facilitate their investments in private credit funds. This Chapman Insights article addresses the scope and current status of those modifications and the impact of those modifications on such rated notes.

The Inflation Reduction Act (the “IRA”), which became law on August 16, 2022, includes only a handful of tax provisions. Though few in number, the new provisions are expected to have a major impact on taxpayers. The corporate minimum income tax and excise tax on stock buybacks are both entirely new tax regimes implemented under the IRA. In addition, the IRA has introduced major changes to the investment tax credit (the “ITC”) and the production tax credit (“PTC”), which are intended to encourage investment in renewable energy projects, such as solar and wind projects.

The success of Ultra Petroleum bondholders’ make-whole claims is grounded in the unusual circumstance of a solvent debtor, with the Fifth Circuit unambiguously holding that make-whole entitlements in non-solvent-debtor cases must be disallowed.

Chapman represented the Chamber of Digital Commerce in connection with its “Spot Bitcoin ETF Initiative” which set out to gain a deep understanding of the industry’s experience in pursuit of a registered Spot Bitcoin ETF and provide insight into the most realistic avenues for ultimately getting the SEC to approve this widely anticipated investment product.

On June 14, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged the City of Rochester, New York, Rosiland Brooks-Harris, the former finance director of the City, Everton Sewell, the former chief financial officer of the Rochester City School District, and Capital Markets Advisors and its principal Richard Ganci with fraud in connection with the 2019 sale of $119 million in municipal bonds.

The Securities and Exchange Commission is taking significant steps to combat “greenwashing,” which occurs when a company conveys false or misleading information to overstate its environmental or sustainability practices, as well as other activities the SEC perceives to be potentially misleading to investors with respect to a company’s ESG efforts.

In an opinion issued on June 15, 2022, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed a decision by the Chancery Court and found that a transfer by an insolvent corporation of substantially all of its assets to a newly created entity (“SeeCubic”) controlled by its secured creditors, in full satisfaction of its debts, violated the corporation’s charter.

On February 19, 2020, the Small Business Reorganization Act came into effect and Debtors with aggregate liabilities that do not exceed $2,566,050 were provided an opportunity to resolve their outstanding liabilities. But even before the SBRA could see its first successes (or failures), the Coronavirus Aid, Relieve and Economic Security Act of 2020 increased a small business’s debt threshold to $7.5 million.

On June 2, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged the Town of Sterlington, Louisiana, its former mayor, Vern A. Breland, the town’s unregistered municipal advisor, Twin Spires Financial LLC and its owner, Aaron B. Fletcher with fraud in connection with the sale of $5.8 million in municipal bonds in two offerings in 2017 and 2018. 

The Delaware Supreme Court is currently considering an appeal of a series of decisions by the Court of Chancery which held that a vote of a majority of shareholders is not required for an insolvent company to transfer its assets to its secured creditors.

This article in the Journal of Corporate Renewal, authored by Chapman Partner Scott A. Lewis, outlines the legal developments stemming from Puerto Rico's economic crisis. 

As interested parties look for more direction on Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) matters, the Loan Syndication and Trading Association (“LSTA”) recently issued new Guidance for Green, Social, and Sustainability-Linked Loans External Reviews (“External Review Guidance”) and Guidance on Social Loan Principles (“Social Loan Principle Guidance”). A summary of this guidance is below.

At the urging of investors and in accordance with the Biden Administration’s climate agenda, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) yesterday issued long-awaited new proposed rules to increase climate-related disclosures. The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors (the “Proposed Rule”), if finalized, would amend the SEC’s rules under the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Act of 1934 to require that registrants provide robust climate related information in their registration statements and annual reports. The rule would apply to all domestic and foreign companies required to be registered with the SEC.

On February 10, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) proposed amendments to certain rules and regulations under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that govern beneficial ownership reporting (the “Proposed Amendments”).¹ The SEC provided that updating these reporting requirements for modern advances in the securities market will reduce information asymmetries and promote transparency and address the timeliness of key filings. Specifically, the Proposed Amendments are aimed at, among other things: (i) shortening deadlines regarding filing of Schedule 13D and Schedule 13G; (ii) clarify how certain derivatives acquired with control intent are treated with respect to beneficial ownership reporting; and (iii) clarify when a “group” is formed for purposes of beneficial ownership reporting.

The Public Finance Initiative (PFI) and the National League of Cities (NLC) have launched the Bond Markets and Racial Equity Project to identify the factors in a municipal bond issuance that signal progress toward racial equity and income equality to investors and other stakeholders. Additionally, PFI and NLC will use the Project to develop resources that can be used by governmental issuers to center racial equity in municipal bond-funded infrastructure investments and to measure how social determinants of equity change over time on a uniform basis. The unprecedented Project is funded by a $4M grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. By funding the Project, the Foundation aims to help issuers leverage the municipal bond market in a meaningful way to help correct racial and economic inequities. 

The proliferation of investments in small, family-owned and mid-cap companies by private equity funds has led to changes in corporate governance provisions in the acquired companies’ organizational documents. Some private equity funds team up with existing management and take a minority position in the acquired company, while others will make an investment only if they can acquire controlling interest or 100 percent ownership of a company. In cases where a fund acquires a controlling interest in a company, it will often populate the company’s governing body with the fund’s principals or employees and the company’s chief executive. The fund may also seek to add outside directors with industry expertise to help govern the company. Where a private equity fund acquires a non-controlling interest, it will often seek to protect its investment by having consent and/or veto rights for certain significant transactions – for instance, the incurrence of debt, issuance of additional equity, and acquisition or disposition of assets. Thus, the organizational documents of a company may contain provisions restricting certain activities without the requisite consent of certain directors or equity holders.

Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) investing continued to grow throughout 2021 and this growth is expected to continue into 2022 as ESG investments are estimated to surpass $41 trillion in assets under management globally by the end of the year. ESG investing occurs when investors make investment decisions based on a company’s environmental, social and governance policies and performance alongside traditional financial metrics. As investment firms, lending institutions, and individual investors are increasingly looking at ESG factors to identify material risks and growth opportunities, a number of trends are expected to emerge in the upcoming year. These include regulation of ESG disclosures, growth in green technology, renewable energy and infrastructure investments, and heightened standards associated with sustainable finance.

On February 9, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) voted 3 to 1 to propose new and amended rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”) to require advisers to private funds to provide additional disclosures to investors in such funds, prohibit certain types of preferential treatment to investors and impose new requirements related to fund audits, books and records and adviser-led secondary transactions.

On January 18, 2022, Judge Laura Taylor Swain of the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico entered an order under PROMESA (as defined below) confirming a Plan of Adjustment (the “Plan”) of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “Commonwealth”), the Employees Retirement System of the Government of Puerto Rico (the “ERS”), and the Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (the “PBA”).¹ The Plan’s confirmation is a major milestone for the Commonwealth and its creditors. The Commonwealth’s restructuring proceeding under Title III of PROMESA is the largest municipal restructuring in United States history.